-
Re: Qingqi
Yea, Mad Max Style...
I wanna be Bubba Zanetti. :icon10:
Seriously, I'm sick of sh...loads of common bikes. OK, no bigger displacements, no fancy suspensions, brakes, LED headlights, but guys, make something distinctive from available technologies, parts snd components.
And they did it.
-
Re: Qingqi
It seems to have a very long wheel base to me, that chain looks extra-long. I am not an engineer, is that a longer than normal chain, I do not imagine a long chain as having any benefits. I image it has more of a propensity to slap. Then there is that one of a kind, or so it seems to be, mono shock/spring.
It is an eye catcher for sure, but it could also be a deathtrap, which to some may be appealing, that being the living on the edge crowd? I recall that when I first looked at the hard tail bobbers and thought who would want a hard tail bike….and it turned out allot of people wanted one? Makes me think if I am not interested in it, it could be incredibly popular?
-
Re: Qingqi
Yes, it is preety long chain, but we're talking about less than 20 HP bike, not "Hayabusa" with extended swingarm. Spring loaded chain tensioner would solve all the (potential) slapping. But again - those are 15" wheels, so it is possible that we do not have the right perception.
-
2 Attachment(s)
Re: Qingqi
Attachment 17147Attachment 17148
It's an odd looking bike and only available in 200cc and 250cc. I think it was pretty expensive
-
Re: Qingqi
-
Re: Qingqi
-
Re: Qingqi
am new to the forum and send a cordial greeting to the entire community.
Have a QINGQI QM200 and I'm looking to be clear about setting the valvulas.Tengo information that says: 0.6-0.8 for admicion and escape.
And elsewhere he tells me is 0.06--0.08 if anyone can help me?
thanks
jotah
-
Re: Qingqi
In hundredths not tenths of millimeters
-
Re: Qingqi
-
Re: Qingqi
No. I thought that this one:
http://i00.i.aliimg.com/photo/v0/511..._dirt_bike.jpg
uses the same tupperware as "Somoto's".... "Dorsoduro", but on a common tubular frame and square tube swingarm.
But I was wrong...