View Poll Results: Lifetime plane ticket or trip into space???
- Voters
- 12. You may not vote on this poll
Thread: What would you choose???
Results 1 to 10 of 17
|
-
#1 What would you choose???06-19-2008, 12:31 PM
Was watching a video with my wife a few days ago and an interesting but silly question surfaced...
If someone offered you two free options...
A) A magic plane ticket to travel anywhere in the world for the rest of your life or...
B) A one week trip into space (maybe orbiting the earth)...
Which one would you choose?
CC---------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to the hippest, most happeneing Adventure Motorcycle Magazine around!
Adventure Motorcycle Dual Sport News Magazine
Help support MCM!! Buy "The Return - Riding Western China" DVD! -
http://www.motocyclops.com/buydvd/
Personal China travel info, photo and video site:
http://www.carlparker.com
-
06-19-2008, 03:46 PM
I'm sick of flying................and all the extra "security". Bags are now being checked going on the metro here in Shanghai. I'm ready to move.
Probably take the space trip...........bummer would be coming back to earth.
-
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 2
06-22-2008, 03:51 PMBecause there are still lots of places I haven't been to, I'd like to see our planet more. It'll be even nicer if I can just go without all the 'security' checks!
L
-
06-22-2008, 04:05 PM
Exploding into space is where it's at!
The earth can be out of this world too but I'd rather be riding my motorcycle when I see it.
CC---------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to the hippest, most happeneing Adventure Motorcycle Magazine around!
Adventure Motorcycle Dual Sport News Magazine
Help support MCM!! Buy "The Return - Riding Western China" DVD! -
http://www.motocyclops.com/buydvd/
Personal China travel info, photo and video site:
http://www.carlparker.com
-
06-22-2008, 06:21 PM
gotta be the free ticket to fly anywhere. i want to orbit the earth but that will be available around 2020 or so for regular travel. as the new planes are going to be flying just inside the earths atmosphere kinda like the u2, blackbird and this mig-25!
looks like in outer space. but still has air to run the engines.
in addition to the private space travel industry trying to improve on an inefficient government model.
looks to be sooner rather than later.
http://www.xcor.com/press-releases/2...l_vehicle.html
i want to float around in 0 gravity though. that’s where it's at!Simple XF200 Blog
http://xf200qlinksupermoto.blogspot.com
XF200 Blog RSS FEED
http://feeds2.feedburner.com/QlinkXf200Motorcycle
You Tube link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1_XLNLE4zw
-
06-24-2008, 03:43 PM
I'd go for the life long plane ticket.
For me a life long exploration of human culture and civilization would be more fulfilling than a week long trip isolated in space in either a space suit or shuttle with nothing to really interact with. Although a trip orbiting the earth would be incredible, the only sense aside from anti gravity (which would be great fun even confined in a tiny ship) would be visual. You don't find fruits you can't identify or hear languages you can't speak in space and the innumberable forms of life and activity on earth make it more interesting to me. Earth is an explosion of life and organic activity whereas space is defined by its lack of these phenomena.
-
06-25-2008, 07:27 AM---------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to the hippest, most happeneing Adventure Motorcycle Magazine around!
Adventure Motorcycle Dual Sport News Magazine
Help support MCM!! Buy "The Return - Riding Western China" DVD! -
http://www.motocyclops.com/buydvd/
Personal China travel info, photo and video site:
http://www.carlparker.com
-
06-25-2008, 09:29 AM
As far as we can see (very close to the ends of the universe), earth is the only planet with life. Using special equipment on the Hubble cosmologists have detected organic molecules in comets which are made of carbon, building block of life on earth, but even the detection of these molecules doesn't mean that life exists there yet or ever will. Even if organic material exists on a molecular level it doesn't affect my point that there's nothing to interact with in space.
Earth is the phenomena. Cosmologists predict that there could be other planets which have similar conditions to earth but the chance of intelligent life is 0.01 percent in each instance (we have found 100+ extra solar planets). Our orbit is in the Goldilocks zone - not too hot, not too cold, just right - plus naturally occurring liquid water. The combination of these elements is stunningly uncommon.
We can observe conditions within the universe and discuss those celestial events with context, but no such context on how the universe fits into whatever larger pieces there are exists.
-
06-25-2008, 10:15 AM
Sweet...the nitty gritty. Lets bust out some ontology!
As far as we can see, or know? I don't think any serious cosmologist would ever say their knowledge of the universe (much less our own oceans) is anything near exhaustive.
At the very "ends" of the universe the data people gather are not only billions of years old but fuzzy at best...usually analysing shifts in extremely faint radio signals and then magically extrapolating data out to wildly unsure, but interesting nonetheless, conclusions.
So what you're saying is that even though our planet and even ourselves are made of much that same material, that we're still somehow different? This likely boils down to what an individual believes, values, and the circles they choose to draw...which is the whole point of the original question actually.
...except for space itself. Not sure what experienced astronauts would say to your remark and looking at the impact craters on the moon...I'm not sure it would agree with you either.
It seems to me, the Earth is a phenomena which exits in relation to other greater and smaller phenomena...much like everything else we perceive. The idea of phenomena itself is a matter of perspective and consciousness, as is world and being.
I'm not trying to belittle the magnificence and unlikelyness of our planet but am trying to stress it's (and our) interconnectedness to/with the perceived universe/world. Some people call it science while others call it religion...I call it riding a motorcycle.
Hahah...I think you been in China too long and it's effecting your grammar. Could you re-render that last statement with clearer context?
CC---------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to the hippest, most happeneing Adventure Motorcycle Magazine around!
Adventure Motorcycle Dual Sport News Magazine
Help support MCM!! Buy "The Return - Riding Western China" DVD! -
http://www.motocyclops.com/buydvd/
Personal China travel info, photo and video site:
http://www.carlparker.com
-
06-25-2008, 11:51 AM
I'm not approaching this from an ontological perspective, but just trying to make some clear distinctions between earth and the observable universe which help me reach a conclusion to the question of the thread. Ontological questions like "what is existence" are really a lot to get caught up in.
Whether or not there's life on the far reaches of the universe (we don't know) is a matter outside of the scope of this topic, since I was establishing without doubt that you won't be encountering any life on an expedition into space - much less on a week long trip which wouldn't take you far at all speaking in universal terms.
Absolutely - we are different from the rest of the observable universe. While unanswered questions remain, as they do in all fields of science, our knowledge of the composition of the universe is substantial as you know.
Interact with space? How does that work? In space, you're either 1: confined to a tiny ship, 2: floating aimlessly, or 3: walking on the surface of the moon (if you're lucky). Don't get me wrong, it offers a beautiful view and a unique chance that very few people have. Even with these significant virtues, does that compare to the countless experiences there are to be had on earth to flood every sense that humans have?
I don't understand what impact craters on the moon have to do with this. They were created billions of years ago - the moon is a large dead rock.
You're approaching this from a philosophical perspective and defining some of these ideas in abstract terms which I am not, so I think there is some misunderstanding.
Since we're being grammar nazis I think you mean affecting my grammar! hahah what I meant is:
We can observe conditions within the universe and discuss those celestial events with context, but no such context on how the universe fits into larger pieces exists. We can discuss events within our universe by observation, but a discussion on what happens outside the universe (which you alluded to by comparison) is without factual basis.
Also the universe is not alive or organic. The idea that the universe has biological qualities (theoretical physicist Lee Smolin writes about this) is a fringe belief not accepted by cosmologists and Smolin himself says that the universe is not actually alive but might exhibit life-like qualities like heredity.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Prime Сasual Dating - Real-life...
Yesterday, 08:19 AM in Off Topic Discussions